| ??? 12/03/07 22:25 Read: times |
#147820 - That should work ... but ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It does point up the weakness of the local search engine. Once one is aware of it, of course, it is easy to work around it, but until then, it's pretty frustrating.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| about that SEARCH feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's the choice of the proper keywords | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ampersand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe, but if they tried it last time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search facility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe it's the other way around | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a q'n'd fix suggestion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How is the search string interpreted? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a few things found out by experimenting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You\'re right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There may be more to this than meets the eye! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use quotes to search for a phrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| made it a FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google, temporarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That should work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TTL Compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are two separate issues | 01/01/70 00:00 |