| ??? 08/01/07 06:49 Modified: 08/01/07 07:22 Read: times |
#142569 - not \\\"scientific\\\" maybe... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... but, if the gadget would not survive the spark test, there is no reason to go to the lab.
And, if Stefan finds some way to "callibrate" the "$5 radio" (ok, he'd perhaps try to find some cheap spectrum analyser, e.g. on e-bay or so) and the "spark generator", maybe using leased, reasonable quality equipment, in some form of open-air test (which is not uncommon for true EMC testing), he can even get close enough. JW PS. don't forget, quality antennae are of utmost importance even for crude measurement... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| cheap EMC testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| $5 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not for emmiting, for immunity against ext.field | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| old sparky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ever been in an EMC laboratory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not \\\"scientific\\\" maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on the value of paper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Backyard susceptance testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the \"cheap\" guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EMC guys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gas igniters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let's estimate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try to charge a 100nF cap with your igniter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 |