??? 07/19/07 20:22 Read: times |
#142046 - Speed? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The Hardware SPI can be faster. Plus is can be on an interupt so that the CPU can process data as it arrives.
But if Bit Banging works in your project, go with it. |
Topic | Author | Date |
AT89S52 and ENC28J60 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Principles - again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, I'm using the ENC28J60 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S52 and ENC28J60 schematic first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what kind of schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So there is no need to drive a car | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you should do what you want to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
echoes of Mr. Ludd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
who is Mr. Ludd ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
your ancestor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, thats why Ben is still using an AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is that true?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for a while | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why would you not use it?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This shows you how to use the HW SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
have a look here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Both of which do use the HW SPI! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
get it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI port at AT89S52 with ENC28J60 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HW SPI in AT89Sxxx? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HW SPI in AT89SXX | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ethernet connector with filters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The answer is in the link | 01/01/70 00:00 |