| Sunday Quiz - Bit Flipper in C | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Here's My 41 Bytes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Very nice, but call it 43 (explained herein) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sunday Quiz Update | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OK Then 39 Bytes... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Oh my goodness | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If you want performance... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| More bytes, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OK Then 38 Bytes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Comma | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 36! Holy cow! Very nice! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| my 36 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Non-conforming | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Wow! 34! |<3WL! :-) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| KEWL = cool in l33t :-) (worse than SMS...) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Wow is right!!! plus another 36 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Broken | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| C doesn't try to save you ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not Broken | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| look for samples of FFT code ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this is competing to make the worst possible | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's certainly not the solution... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| correction | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Unless you're "porting" ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| there are situations... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| au contraire | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| overlayed variables | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| non-religious reasons and debunking some | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I doubt that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| now try | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| with the error or without? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the 49 is a compare the 48 is coding time | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 47, 48, 49 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| for such a cause as | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Still more | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| one more point for Pascal | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Language and vocabulary contributions | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Language and vocabulary contributions | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, it's much more "self-documenting" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Singular? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| well... around 5 minutes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's not funny | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this is why I don't like the "modern" over-windowe | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Tastes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Skill in reading | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| in other words: because there are burglars detecti | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's why one should use ASM and not 'C' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| nope | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| are you perfect? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's why the documentation is necessary | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the old argument from C haters | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| One page of comments per statement? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If it's to be understood later on ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| if I have to explain my choice of syntax in C, the | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The point is to show why, and not why-not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I post, you 'reply' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry, I still need more help on this | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Never had to do that ... and for good reason. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Maybe just one unclear point now | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, if it were up to me ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Thanks | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I hope you're not missing my point ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You explained yourself clearly | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Upside down | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just look at the body of work ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nature of commercial software | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Maybe it's more like a 747 vs. a bicycle | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| on driving and "coding" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| even Mr. K agrees | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Post Mortem #1 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I object | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Post Mortem #1.1 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| both translations are "strange" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Uninitialised? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 20 bytes. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| teaching the compiler... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Maybe for HLLs, but not for C ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I know this is the praxis.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| incorrect/incomplete statement | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Post Mortem #2 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Vote: 1. Yes 2. Dont care | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| modify it!!!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| vote | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| methink | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| its interesting that C | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I like your proposal | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
