Email:
Password:
Remember Me |
Create Account
(Free)
Consulting Services
The 8052.com Book
Message Forum
8052 Forum
Chat Board
Forum Rules (Read!)
Tutorials
Tutorials Index
8051/8052 Tutorial
16-Bit Math
LCD Programming
8051 Instruction Set
News
Back to Subject List
Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/11/07 00:25
Read: times
#140529
- Comma
Responding to: ???'s
previous message
Save This Code
UC TestFlip(UC c) { UC r,i=8;WH(i--)r=r*2|c&1,c/=2;RT r; }
List of 87 messages in thread
Topic
Author
Date
Sunday Quiz - Bit Flipper in C
01/01/70 00:00
Here's My 41 Bytes
01/01/70 00:00
Very nice, but call it 43 (explained herein)
01/01/70 00:00
Sunday Quiz Update
01/01/70 00:00
OK Then 39 Bytes...
01/01/70 00:00
Oh my goodness
01/01/70 00:00
If you want performance...
01/01/70 00:00
More bytes, but ...
01/01/70 00:00
OK Then 38 Bytes
01/01/70 00:00
Comma
01/01/70 00:00
36! Holy cow! Very nice!
01/01/70 00:00
my 36
01/01/70 00:00
Non-conforming
01/01/70 00:00
Wow! 34! |<3WL! :-)
01/01/70 00:00
???
01/01/70 00:00
KEWL = cool in l33t :-) (worse than SMS...)
01/01/70 00:00
Wow is right!!! plus another 36
01/01/70 00:00
Broken
01/01/70 00:00
C doesn't try to save you ...
01/01/70 00:00
Not Broken
01/01/70 00:00
look for samples of FFT code ...
01/01/70 00:00
this is competing to make the worst possible
01/01/70 00:00
it's certainly not the solution...
01/01/70 00:00
correction
01/01/70 00:00
Unless you're "porting" ...
01/01/70 00:00
there are situations...
01/01/70 00:00
au contraire
01/01/70 00:00
overlayed variables
01/01/70 00:00
non-religious reasons and debunking some
01/01/70 00:00
I doubt that
01/01/70 00:00
now try
01/01/70 00:00
with the error or without?
01/01/70 00:00
the 49 is a compare the 48 is coding time
01/01/70 00:00
47, 48, 49
01/01/70 00:00
for such a cause as
01/01/70 00:00
Still more
01/01/70 00:00
one more point for Pascal
01/01/70 00:00
Language and vocabulary contributions
01/01/70 00:00
Language and vocabulary contributions
01/01/70 00:00
Yes, it's much more "self-documenting"
01/01/70 00:00
Singular?
01/01/70 00:00
well... around 5 minutes
01/01/70 00:00
It's not funny
01/01/70 00:00
this is why I don't like the "modern" over-windowe
01/01/70 00:00
Tastes
01/01/70 00:00
Skill in reading
01/01/70 00:00
in other words: because there are burglars detecti
01/01/70 00:00
That's why one should use ASM and not 'C'
01/01/70 00:00
nope
01/01/70 00:00
are you perfect?
01/01/70 00:00
That's why the documentation is necessary
01/01/70 00:00
the old argument from C haters
01/01/70 00:00
One page of comments per statement?
01/01/70 00:00
If it's to be understood later on ...
01/01/70 00:00
if I have to explain my choice of syntax in C, the
01/01/70 00:00
The point is to show why, and not why-not
01/01/70 00:00
I post, you 'reply'
01/01/70 00:00
Sorry, I still need more help on this
01/01/70 00:00
Never had to do that ... and for good reason.
01/01/70 00:00
Maybe just one unclear point now
01/01/70 00:00
Well, if it were up to me ...
01/01/70 00:00
Thanks
01/01/70 00:00
I hope you're not missing my point ...
01/01/70 00:00
You explained yourself clearly
01/01/70 00:00
Upside down
01/01/70 00:00
Just look at the body of work ...
01/01/70 00:00
Nature of commercial software
01/01/70 00:00
Maybe it's more like a 747 vs. a bicycle
01/01/70 00:00
on driving and "coding"
01/01/70 00:00
even Mr. K agrees
01/01/70 00:00
Post Mortem #1
01/01/70 00:00
I object
01/01/70 00:00
Post Mortem #1.1
01/01/70 00:00
both translations are "strange"
01/01/70 00:00
Uninitialised?
01/01/70 00:00
20 bytes.
01/01/70 00:00
teaching the compiler...
01/01/70 00:00
Maybe for HLLs, but not for C ...
01/01/70 00:00
I know this is the praxis....
01/01/70 00:00
incorrect/incomplete statement
01/01/70 00:00
Post Mortem #2
01/01/70 00:00
Vote: 1. Yes 2. Dont care
01/01/70 00:00
modify it!!!!
01/01/70 00:00
vote
01/01/70 00:00
methink
01/01/70 00:00
its interesting that C
01/01/70 00:00
I like your proposal
01/01/70 00:00
Back to Subject List