??? 09/14/06 07:18 Read: times |
#124270 - if you supply via cable... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... wouldn't it be simpler to use the presence of supply on both connectors for the detection?
Also, I learned (from a younger colleague - I try to listen to those younger than me, too, they have fresh view on the things and they are not necessarily wrong) that a relay is an electronic part, and it is not wise to frown upon it just because it is not solid state... But, if you want desperately a bombenfest analog switch, make your own from two power MOSFETs and an invertor... :-) JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
RS485 and DE, \RE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not pantyhose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stick to the National and B&B stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the worse 485 wiring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
automatic termination is the solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what\'s that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
actually very simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I am still none the wiser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
chain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've got it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It works, you work out the details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe not biasing A&B... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then use a high enough voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
biassing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
answers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you supply via cable... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Transceiver with switchable termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for the tip! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
great.Oliver, just this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it would, but think this through | 01/01/70 00:00 |