??? 09/06/06 12:27 Read: times |
#123747 - multiple instrcutions per cycle Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, that would simply mean multiple pipelines in parallel. I don't know anyone claiming that RISC is confined to SI*D (as in Single instruction, single or multiple data) architectures.
My point was that a cpu which understands an instruction that does 3 things in one go is not RISC anymore as it violates the "simple instruction set" criterion. |
Topic | Author | Date |
motorola versus 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nebulous question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wile E. Coyote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's not a 65HC11! It's 68HC11! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ergo... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Q.E.D. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QEF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maarten has got it right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Latin... and I thought this was an english forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You've got to expand your horizons. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No way... I\'m going to be in missery... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Latin is more useful than C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED v Q.E.D. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MIPS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Processing power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Architecture and Instruction Set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It does depend on the instruction set. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RISC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RISC! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one instr. / cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
multiple instrcutions per cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
None of this stops the mfg from calling it a RISC | 01/01/70 00:00 |