Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/11/06 15:03
Read: times


 
#122059 - That should already have been done ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
In reality, there should be no possible way to "squeeze" any additional RAM savings out of your code if it's done properly. No deliverable code should have anything at all in it that isn't absolutely essential to the product's requirements. That includes non-essential bytes of RAM storage. The amount of memory required by the software should surface during initial design. The only remaining variable would be stack usage.

Adding a component when there's an obvious way to avoid it such as stashing that byte that you look at twice a day in the LCD RAM that you otherwise don't use is a lot smarter than adding another component to the BOM, adding another risk to the statistical reliability of the system, and adding the cost of a small RAM, its receiving inspection, its inventory, its installation, and its acceptance testing.

That's likely to get you onto the short-list for dismissal.

BTW, what's the smallest, cheapest RAM you've been able to buy in small (25-99) quantity?

RE


List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
e-mail, they write e-mail            01/01/70 00:00      
   And in the e-mail, they answered themselves            01/01/70 00:00      
   nah            01/01/70 00:00      
      unused locations can be used as scratchpad            01/01/70 00:00      
         sure, when you want to show your \'skills\'            01/01/70 00:00      
   or maybe            01/01/70 00:00      
   my standard response to such            01/01/70 00:00      
      Additional Standard Response            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, Joe I use that one when the secons e-mail arr            01/01/70 00:00      
         I thought...            01/01/70 00:00      
            and sometimes it's not so nice ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, unfortunately...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Not unfortunate            01/01/70 00:00      
                  number 10 is who keeps me going            01/01/70 00:00      
            the question is "what is help?"            01/01/70 00:00      
            Indeed.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Albert Schweitzer            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Please see my private mail            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Read and answered. Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I read and enjoyed it...            01/01/70 00:00      
      my response:            01/01/70 00:00      
         ah ha.....and stuff            01/01/70 00:00      
            LCD code            01/01/70 00:00      
         If it's a character LCD, he CAN and should ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            naah            01/01/70 00:00      
               That should already have been done ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List