| ??? 05/04/06 19:35 Read: times |
#115605 - Maths Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In all its gory algebraic detail:
Resonance at w = 1/sqrt(LC) which nullifies complex portion and leaves real portion as R, easy enough. Assuming this were the correct circuit form (which it's not), would then take the imaginary portion, differentiate with respect to f, set the resulting beast equal to -31.8, and evaluate at f = 100 MHz. There must be a better way because it's hard to discern information from equations as complex as these. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PhD Qualifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Study resonance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RLC Circuits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And that's all you're getting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maths | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maths | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simplify ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ancient books | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| books | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the role of RL and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stay with 1/Z | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ... and at resonance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Vector-diagram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| phasor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 |