| ??? 02/27/06 21:11 Read: times |
#110880 - Portable? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
'C' is NOT portable
'C' is NOT portable 'C' is NOT portable 'C' is NOT portable If you use it carefully & intelligently, and understand the issues, you can use 'C' to write code with a high degree of portability. But, as ever, the mere choice of 'C' as a programming language does not of itself give portability. Computer Scientists love to go on about Portability but, in embedded systems, the requirement is often so specific to the target system that portablity is of much lesser concern - possibly none. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil C51 and Math | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eval version? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not only but also | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Come now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Come off it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| poorly typed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Typing (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ian | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What type? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any decent compiler will give you a warn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Get Promoted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too much promotion! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hells Bells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ding Dong! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C vs assembler, take 655321 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| anyone else will be a programmer in name | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Programmer laziness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WebPage ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Much different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And Also | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C and C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Portable? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| handle your microprocessor functi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hm, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil does it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, | 01/01/70 00:00 |