| ??? 02/23/06 22:49 Modified: 02/23/06 23:24 Read: times |
#110638 - No, however... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil Said:
That's not saying that "CPLD" Stands for "Crossover PLD", is it? Not in my book :) The 'C' stands for complex as far as I'm concerned. That said however, it appears that Lattice offers this device as an 'alternative' to run-of-the-mill CPLD's and FPGA (Refer to the Advertisment located on RHS of the Lattice webpage in Andy's Link). To be fair, it seems only logical to ultimately have several cheap industry standard programmable logic parts ie: the 22V10 or XC3000 series, perhaps as a +100k flash-based FPGA solution even? I don't think the XO series falls into this category - yet. Valentin |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| FPGA/CPLD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Security | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FPGA's were MMI's also ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| copying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, however... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about FPGA in 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In a way yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i heard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA vs microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You know it makes sense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xilinx stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flash based | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic logic elements differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It seems... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| practical consequence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jan, Try reading this post | 01/01/70 00:00 |