| ??? 02/23/06 06:53 Read: times |
#110563 - Re: comparison Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think the definition of late is getting a little murky :) For example, the MachXO series 'CPLD' or "Crossover Programmable Logic Device" as Lattice call it has enough resouces on the top-range model (LCMXO2280) to be considered an FPGA - albeit a small one?
Valentin |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| FPGA/CPLD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Security | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FPGA's were MMI's also ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| copying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, however... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about FPGA in 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In a way yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i heard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA vs microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You know it makes sense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xilinx stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flash based | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic logic elements differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It seems... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| practical consequence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jan, Try reading this post | 01/01/70 00:00 |