| ??? 10/01/10 18:44 Read: times |
#178834 - 2 chips maybe better Responding to: ???'s previous message |
2 chips maybe better a separate digital Pot or D/A. The the Cost and availability of the debugging tools may matter.
Otherwise coders choice. Note that There are other non 8052 choices if it matters. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What would you use? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another query | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If even you Americans don't understand each other... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My point was ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PSoC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The display is really simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is a '51 PSoC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051=PSoC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are several ways... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's going to have to be a delicate introduction to MCU's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| parametric search | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Couldn't find that ... this time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| built-in DAC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| also in some 3xx's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F330-GP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've decided that's a good choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe drive LEDs without LED driver? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I haven't yet considered that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog DevicesADUC814 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's one of the sheets I sent him | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 chips maybe better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what resolution? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They're under consideration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '51 with d to a | 01/01/70 00:00 |