| ??? 10/01/10 14:01 Read: times |
#178826 - 8051=PSoC3 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
<there is a '51 PSoC and is this not it? The 8051 part is the PSoC3 that I referred to. They are still harder to find than hen's teeth although the development kit and software are easily available. The contacts I have are promising availabilty really soon now, as well as the PSoC5 (ARM Cortex M3) but it has been many months, if not years since these parts first surfaced. -Aubrey |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What would you use? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another query | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If even you Americans don't understand each other... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My point was ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PSoC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The display is really simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is a '51 PSoC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051=PSoC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are several ways... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's going to have to be a delicate introduction to MCU's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| parametric search | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Couldn't find that ... this time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| built-in DAC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| also in some 3xx's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F330-GP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've decided that's a good choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe drive LEDs without LED driver? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I haven't yet considered that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog DevicesADUC814 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's one of the sheets I sent him | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 chips maybe better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what resolution? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They're under consideration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '51 with d to a | 01/01/70 00:00 |