??? 06/16/10 10:41 Read: times |
#176717 - Ah, now I see... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Andy,
I've just had a look at how some more controllers declare their clock control register, and at what sort of functions they assign to its bits. The name seems to commonly change between CKCON and CKCON0, and its location seems to most often alternate between 0x8E and 0x8F. That's no problem for me. What is an issue in my case, however, is the fact that the clock control register's assigned bit functions also seem to vary between device/ manufacturer. Ah, now I see where you're coming from, Andy. Good point! Gee, that's a bit of a spanner in the works, isn't it? I may need to study a bunch of different controllers, and then set up a HAL header file with macro sets for each variation. Crumbs, that got complicated in a hurry! Regards, Murray R. Van Luyn. |