??? 06/13/10 14:41 Read: times |
#176639 - Thanks Michael. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Michael.
You're probably right about my observation being the result of an inadvertent spell-checker intervention. That's a pretty clever deduction on your part, Michael. Regardless of the cause for it, my complaint did have a rather ungrateful subtext to it. I apologise if I have managed to offend anyone who might really deserve far better. Regards, Murray R. Van Luyn. |