??? 02/22/10 14:30 Read: times |
#173418 - tough, but true Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
That's a very convoluted way of saying: "If you have to ask, then you're not qualified to do it." Although that may sound harsh, I'm afraid it's true: if you can't even get the basics of what diodes, etc, to use when it's all working perfectly - how can you be sure that you've considered all the risks when things go wrong? ![]() |
Topic | Author | Date |
Zero crossing detector - technique adoption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sounds like a bad idea to me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
relying on parasitic diodes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Confusing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Designing to typical values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what blather | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
" IDEA ? " - RIDICULOUS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at least for this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh dear: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tough, but true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just caught this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Idiom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It really is a *very* bad idea! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't blindly follow app note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's not so much the parasitic diodes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What should I do ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That won't help at all! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two wrongs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most app-notes don't work ... because they're wrong! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is typical ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I hate to tell this,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
App engineers not always the sharpest tools in the shed![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unbelievable!! | 01/01/70 00:00 |