| ??? 02/22/10 14:07 Read: times |
#173415 - at least for this one Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Please see: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads...40171a.pdf
at least for this one you can sue microchip if they come up with a new process that does not leave the (parasitic) diodes. http://www.angelfire.com/electroni...t/zero.pdf before you comment. RIDICULOUS some idiot have found parasitic didodes in a chip and have no knowledge whatsoever if a revised process will have them. Ignore this statement if you can find the parasitic diodes mentioned in the datasheet. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Zero crossing detector - technique adoption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds like a bad idea to me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relying on parasitic diodes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Confusing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Designing to typical values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what blather | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| " IDEA ? " - RIDICULOUS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at least for this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh dear: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tough, but true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just caught this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Idiom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It really is a *very* bad idea! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't blindly follow app note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so much the parasitic diodes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What should I do ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That won't help at all! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two wrongs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most app-notes don't work ... because they're wrong! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is typical ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I hate to tell this,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
App engineers not always the sharpest tools in the shed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unbelievable!! | 01/01/70 00:00 |