Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/16/09 15:31
Read: times


 		 #171660 - "all-purpose" isn't a new definition
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It was "all-purpose" at least back to -82 or -83 somewhere, which is way before Wikipedia or WWW.

But more than once, an acronyme has - or gets - multiple definitions.

DVD was Digital Video Disc and became Digital Versatile Disc.

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
BASCOM help            01/01/70 00:00      
   Debounced key?            01/01/70 00:00      
      problem mostly solved            01/01/70 00:00      
   Learn the architecture, hardware, and instruction set            01/01/70 00:00      
      BASIC - Acronym            01/01/70 00:00      
         depends on whom you ask, I guess            01/01/70 00:00      
            "all-purpose" isn't a new definition            01/01/70 00:00      
               What's in a name?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well, I never found it to be particularly "algorithmic"            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Indeed!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Relic of the GOTO mayhem of original BASIC            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wasn't that the order of the day back then?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              That wasn't its intent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 possible to write spaghetti code in Pascal or in 'C'            01/01/70 00:00      
            From the horse's mouth!            01/01/70 00:00      
            A clear case of PCMCIA            01/01/70 00:00      
      Basics - in the "foundational" sense            01/01/70 00:00      
         Other programming languages are available            01/01/70 00:00      
         programming languages            01/01/70 00:00      
            Assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
            Focus!            01/01/70 00:00      
            How about MIDE-51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why is that "bad"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's not bad :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not necessarily true            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List