Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/16/09 15:15
Read: times


 
#171659 - depends on whom you ask, I guess
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Back in the mid-'70's, I worked with a fellow who'd been at GE when they developed the timeshared BASIC that we were implementing on our system. His doc's from GE called it what I stated. I've actually never heard mention of "all-purpose" where I recalled "algorithmic".

I hope you didn't get that from the often-wrong Wikipedia. It took me two years to get them to acknowledge that they had omitted the most widely used form of Manchester code, namely that in the IEEE 802.3 standard. Like me, they'd been unable to snag a copy of the standard long enough to ferret out the definition.

Even so, they only went as far as to say, "Well ... it can be this ... or it can be the exact opposite." Their "wrong", as far as the IEEE standard is concerned, definition went viral and now there are six or seven references to the incorrect usage with respect to Ethernet, for every correct one on the www.

There's no telling which is actually correct, since the information pool has been contaminated.

RE


List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
BASCOM help            01/01/70 00:00      
   Debounced key?            01/01/70 00:00      
      problem mostly solved            01/01/70 00:00      
   Learn the architecture, hardware, and instruction set            01/01/70 00:00      
      BASIC - Acronym            01/01/70 00:00      
         depends on whom you ask, I guess            01/01/70 00:00      
            "all-purpose" isn't a new definition            01/01/70 00:00      
               What's in a name?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well, I never found it to be particularly "algorithmic"            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Indeed!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Relic of the GOTO mayhem of original BASIC            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wasn't that the order of the day back then?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              That wasn't its intent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 possible to write spaghetti code in Pascal or in 'C'            01/01/70 00:00      
            From the horse's mouth!            01/01/70 00:00      
            A clear case of PCMCIA            01/01/70 00:00      
      Basics - in the "foundational" sense            01/01/70 00:00      
         Other programming languages are available            01/01/70 00:00      
         programming languages            01/01/70 00:00      
            Assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
            Focus!            01/01/70 00:00      
            How about MIDE-51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why is that "bad"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's not bad :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not necessarily true            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List