??? 02/24/09 18:56 Read: times |
#162765 - I'm not sure I agree Responding to: ???'s previous message |
CRC, parity, framing, ... are useful tools, and should be used when possible. But the problem with them is that they hide problems. They make sure that you only see correct messages being accepted, but at what resend rate?
In the end, you want a design where you can talk with all units correctly without any use of CRC, ... You just reserve this extra protection for catching broken packages if one device manages to reboot in the middle of a transmission or someone plays with a stun gun close to your wiring or similar. Have you followed up the bit error rate on your transmissions? They are the true measure of if your physical layer is able to trasnfer data reliable or not. |
Topic | Author | Date |
RS485 problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just 1? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The 120 ohm resistor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
VCC = 5V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Scope? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
daisy chain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some hints... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
100 meters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
7 clocks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Topology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: topology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, don't! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Getting there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So, what was the cause of failure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
with additional components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where do you have this circuit from? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
from my Mentor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ben's site | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mission Accomplished | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm not sure I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe I misunderstood your earlier post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then how could you ask .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
With noise+etc reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
email updated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here's info's........ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That means you get | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only when seeing nosie? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not exactly but as per requirement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAT5 ethernet cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
100 Ohm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More details here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you check the FAQ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |