??? 01/13/09 05:09 Read: times |
#161462 - WOW WOW WOW Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
One thing that matters to me at the moment is that I don't want to have to provide a command and addresses to start the process WOW, this is unbeliveable. At some point you are going to have to provision some means to load up your part with the pattern anyway. What better way to do that than a low cost / low pin count MCU. The same provisioning can be used to send the extremely simple four byte sequence to get the read started at the initial set of conditions!! Without a whole lot of pondering it is feasible that a single small hardware design can be fitted to support any number of protocol sequencer dongles. The presence of an MCU offers ways to add additional flexibility as well to support some type of GPIO structure for interface. Michael Karas |
Topic | Author | Date |
Fast serial memory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How large is "not too large" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check Serial SPI Flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Industry Enabled SO-16W Socket | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I might not even need a socket. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some New Technologies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are those RAMTRON parts avaialble? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not use that particular chip but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WOW WOW WOW | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing extraordinary ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mcu and clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For OTP/Flash memory -- SST | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
those look promising! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mutually exclusive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not entirely ... RAMTRON has one or two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not too large ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
serial RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I saw this, and thought of you... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unfortunately, SRAM's forget when power is lost![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |