| ??? 08/16/11 10:13 Read: times |
#183372 - No need to use that instruction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michale,
I can also write that instruction in many other ways.But my purpose of write that post is to getting guidance for driving the new IC(HT16K33) for me. I consider your instruction while I develope that code but didn't get success with using that instruction because the problem is not that of instruction but the problem is deciding the exact command that IC need to display the digits. So I need your guidance at that time for deciding the exact command (If you had worked on these kind of ICs previously). The main thing,after complition of code, is debate needed on writing istruction ? I always need your humble guidance not pressure. Regards Maunik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Driving HT16K33 using 89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post legible source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HLL Delay Routines - beware!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| modified code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you think that will help?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some comments on code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testing of new code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HLL Delay Routines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CY in C ? _NOT_ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll use new code. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Getting success | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one modification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For How Long? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No need to use that instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start by caring about the C standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Learning the 'C' programming language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C Language Supports No Carry Bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Talking to HT16K33 | 01/01/70 00:00 |