??? 08/08/11 05:55 Read: times |
#183240 - HLL Delay Routines Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maunik Choksi said:
The delay is not much important in this application since it is only one time used & is used for giving
stabililising time to 16K33 ic after power on. So minimum value of it should be 100 ms but more than 100ms I don't think affect the whole display code. You are still missing the point! You cannot even predict the minimum delay of a HLL loop - the compiler could optimise it to nothing at all! BTW: don't manually type line breaks in your text - the forum will wrap text automatically for you; eg, The delay is not much important in this application since it is only one time used & is used for giving stabililising time to 16K33 ic after power on. So minimum value of it should be 100 ms but more than 100ms I don't think affect the whole display code. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Driving HT16K33 using 89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to post legible source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HLL Delay Routines - beware!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
modified code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How do you think that will help?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
some comments on code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
testing of new code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HLL Delay Routines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CY in C ? _NOT_ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'll use new code. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Getting success | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one modification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For How Long? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No need to use that instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Start by caring about the C standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Learning the 'C' programming language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C Language Supports No Carry Bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Talking to HT16K33 | 01/01/70 00:00 |