| ??? 04/13/10 13:23 Read: times |
#175021 - Really important to protect company names Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So "leading developer and manufacturer of sophisticated test and measurement equipment" is making fools of themselves by showing a total lack of competence.
That was one of the worst (quite possibly the worst!) attempt I have ever seen at trying to selectively describe their interests in a new developer. Just as funny as when I have received mails on mailing list from senior softwared developers, heads of R&D etc of reasonably well known companies, where the person are totaly absolutely unable to program, understand the difference between asynchronous or synchronous data transfers or similar. It really is important that a company name is not closely associated with really stupid questions, requests, claims, ... Why buy TV cards from a manufacturer who have developers who don't know the difference between logical and bit-wise logic operations? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Do employers know what they are asking for? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course, they don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| often enough, they don't know what the acronyms mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HR shouldn't try to evaluate competence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well at my new job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I stumbled over this laughable example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really important to protect company names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agency != Employer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not always the case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better to just ask for any additional skills | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what I have found is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-technical MBAs in technical management positions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The other issue.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well ... I don't know the answer ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |