| ??? 12/22/09 16:16 Read: times |
#171863 - No, no... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
...he must pay for the extra, of course!
Kai Klaas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Sizing of copper cables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is Your USA customer again? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the USA client.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Customer likes copper? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| machanical strength against what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds like nonsense to me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Give him what he wants... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't forget the cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transients | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mechanical Integrity of cabling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The best way to do the job right ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very doubtful of what you just said... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you present firm requirements ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Replies pretty well sum up .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Flexing ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No reason to argue... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no need to test the cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most cables lives a sheltered life | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's where things go off the rails | 01/01/70 00:00 |