| ??? 12/22/09 12:43 Read: times |
#171852 - Sounds like nonsense to me! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raghunathan said:
The customer wants to double the cross section in each of the above case, and says that besides electrical rating, mechanical strength and safety margin also is to be considered. The cross-sectional area is really only to do with electrical ratings. If he wants special mechanical ratings, then different types of sheathing, armour, etc are available. Don't forget that doubling the CSA will also make the cable much heavier - bringing a whole load of other issues... But I feel that my selection is adequate. I think you're probably right! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Sizing of copper cables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is Your USA customer again? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the USA client.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Customer likes copper? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| machanical strength against what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds like nonsense to me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Give him what he wants... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't forget the cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transients | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mechanical Integrity of cabling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The best way to do the job right ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very doubtful of what you just said... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you present firm requirements ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Replies pretty well sum up .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Flexing ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No reason to argue... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no need to test the cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most cables lives a sheltered life | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's where things go off the rails | 01/01/70 00:00 |