Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/21/09 14:43
Read: times


 
#167661 - a little more specificity, please, Chico
Responding to: ???'s previous message
He's tended to wander about, somewhat, hasn't he?

I think some of this has been caused by various contrasting views confusing him in his approach to controlling the drive for his LED's.

To some of us, a "constant-current driver" means a specific component, while to others, myself included, it simply means a driver with precisely controlled constant current. With the one class of component, the constant current is determined by the component. With the other, it is determined by the implementor. That way, the LED supply can be arbitrarily high, in order to accommodate the higher forward voltage of the different-color LED's, still allowing him to use the otherwise adequate ULN2803 darlington that he has and with which he's familiar.

I don't know whether he's considered that he can drive a MOSFET, e.g. IRF640, with a MAX232A (He may well already have those). He won't need the negative voltage, but the voltage doubler will get him the 10 volts he needs to drive his high-current, high-voltage MOSFET.

RE

List of 30 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
High power led driver            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you accounted for Vce(sat) ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   resistors are not a good solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      Have you considered a current mirror?            01/01/70 00:00      
         mirror, mirror on the wall            01/01/70 00:00      
            No question about it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               But was that the question?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I focused on the brightness match ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Doesn't it show that he's missed an important point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        He doesn't really have to consider voltage            01/01/70 00:00      
                           for a (short) while            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sorry for the delay            01/01/70 00:00      
      The ULN works perfectly well - as far as it goes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      MOSFET Technical Info            01/01/70 00:00      
      Key term is 'logic level'            01/01/70 00:00      
         commom part            01/01/70 00:00      
            Catalogue?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Mosfet            01/01/70 00:00      
      I believe you'll have a problem ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         IRF530            01/01/70 00:00      
            Dig a little deeper, Chico ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               circuit... will work if I do this way?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Look at the specification for IRLD120            01/01/70 00:00      
                     now i get confoosed            01/01/70 00:00      
                        High power            01/01/70 00:00      
                        He has digressed            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I suspect it's because he needs a constant current switch            01/01/70 00:00      
                              And I suspect that we are wildly guessing...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 a little more specificity, please, Chico            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List