Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/29/09 15:08
Read: times


 
#161822 - Yes, faster is better in this case
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Per Westermark said:
The problem with scanning like a TV is that the laser needs quite high intensity, since it has to scan a significant area.

If you use them in a darkened room, you have considerable flexibility.

If drawing in X-Y, then you normally don't have time for any feedback loop. You just calibrate the system manually to know what analog values that represents the two ends of a movement, and then drive a voice coil run as fast as possible. The big thing here is speed - not precision - since you must be able to do a full trace within a very limited time to get your eyes to see a static drawing.

The primary advantage of using the rotating mirror approach is that you can time the horizontal sweep "open-loop".

Most people who tries this uses voice coils from loudspeakers, since they are designed for very high speed and reasonably good linearity.


This depends on what you mean by "high-speed." I tend to think of "high-speed" as meaning > ~10 MHz. Speaker voice coils operate at audio frequency, i.e. < 25 KHz. I suppose that's why I like those relatively fast (>20 MHz) one-clockers.

RE


List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Closed loop for HDD head coil help            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe it will work ... or maybe not.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Gradient transparency + led + photo-diode?            01/01/70 00:00      
         it will not be easy            01/01/70 00:00      
            more info            01/01/70 00:00      
               It's not as easy as one might think            01/01/70 00:00      
                  harder than I thought            01/01/70 00:00      
                     There are ways ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        speed is essential when drawing            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Yes, faster is better in this case            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Relativity            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 That would likely work            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Flexible Thinking - Flexible Arm            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List