Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/18/08 21:51
Read: times


 
#160120 - it's a tradeoff
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If you're rolling your own, with limited volume, the development cost for SD will swallow up the cost of those pesky CF connectors, since the CF code is pretty straightforward and the performance is high.

If you want fast SD, the hardware development isn't "free" either, as you'll need a separate CRC channel for each of the 4 data bits used in high-speed mode, and you'll need to merge the streams post-check. That uses lots of MCU bandwidth and causes a large delay, resulting in very low performance. In volume, however, the SD is WAY cheaper and the connectors aren't as fragile, either. If the volume justifies it, however, the SD is every bit as fast as the USB. If you find the interconnection module price too high, it's because the volume is low.

That simplifies your choice, doesn't it?

RE






List of 7 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Removable Memory: Redux            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why the USB?            01/01/70 00:00      
      SD not IDE            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes ... my bad ... should have been clearer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Wouldn't it be less costly to skip the USB?            01/01/70 00:00      
         it's a tradeoff            01/01/70 00:00      
   after figuring out how to use it ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List