| ??? 05/02/08 12:10 Read: times |
#154295 - Dimensional Constraints Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
I agree with Kai. And besides that this sensor is overall very unimpressive. One could even be tempted to use one or more nasty words to describe this part. If I were looking to measure some force in an industrial test setup I think I would be searching for something a whole lot more robust. A small load cell that incorporates tried and true strain gage technology comes to mind.
http://www.massload.com/ml200s.htm http://www.rinstrum.com/News/EN/P...0b1815.pdf http://www.hariom-loadcell.com/Exporters...-Cell.html Michael Karas These sensors are way bigger in dimensions than the Flexiforce or other FSRs .If dimension is the constraint it cannot be used. -Ap |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Flexiforce sensor and chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| op-amp output is what you will get | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'typical' job for a '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PLC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds like a plan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you noticed, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stretching the inverting amplifier is crap! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I Agree; This Sensor is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dimensional Constraints | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never say never.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| load cell <> strain gauge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its hard some times | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flexiforce | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Specification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think it is great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ejector seat ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With what sitting in the seat? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Even moderators? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what else would anyone expect from an FSR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well. | 01/01/70 00:00 |