| ??? 03/14/08 08:48 Read: times |
#152250 - Public Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think the negative scores need to be kept public - otherwise it could appear that the post is simply being ignored;
Also, if the descriptive text pointed the original poster to the appropriate resolution, no other readers of the post would benefit from that. In particular, of course, the 'answer is wrong' score needs to be public - and whoever gives it should be required to explain. Craig Steiner said:
... but rather when they view their message they'd actually see prominent text (that only they see) that says something like "Members of the forum have indicated that it would be helpful if you read the 8051 bible, the tutorials, etc." or "Members of the forum request that you please include comments in your code". Absolutely - and such advice would also be of benefit to other readers of the post. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| New Forum: Opinions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| constructive criticism | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Public | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no score | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What good has it done to members till date | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite what I meant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perhaps another category ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Feature already exists | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is not easy ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Categories | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep It Simple & Stupid, please. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you think that's a good thing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That will be fixed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something to absolutely avoid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hiding scores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Next Page", "Previous Page" links | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just stumbled on this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Subjective | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not insist on the phrase ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |