??? 11/21/07 15:14 Read: times |
#147310 - Declaration Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stefan, I believe that your declarations for your pointer to a function is incorrect and might be ambiguous for some compilers.
I think this is the correct convention for a pointer to a function of type void with no arguments in C: void (*functionptr)(); Try this code and see what you get: #define __MAIN_C__ const char mychar1[6]="ABCDEF"; const char *mycharptr; int mymode; void xgetstr1(void); void xgetstr2(void); typedef struct {int mode; void (*funcptr1)(); const void (*funcptr2)(); } myoneset; void xgetstr1(void){ mycharptr=&mychar1[0];} void xgetstr2(void){ mycharptr=&mychar1[1];} myoneset listofsets[2] = {{1,&xgetstr1,&xgetstr2}, {3,&xgetstr2,&xgetstr1}}; int main (void) { const void (*myfuncptr)(); int i ; mycharptr=&mychar1[0]; mycharptr=&mychar1[2]; myfuncptr=&xgetstr1; myfuncptr=listofsets[0].funcptr1; myfuncptr=listofsets[1].funcptr2; myfuncptr=0; mymode=2; for (i=0;i<2;i++) { if (listofsets[0].mode==mymode) myfuncptr=listofsets[1].funcptr2; } return(0); } |
Topic | Author | Date |
Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |