??? 11/20/07 12:33 Read: times |
#147245 - no wrong path Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stefan Kanev said:
On arm-gcc this is ok, on IAR-MSP430 this is bad.I didnt find reason. And now for me question is - to delete or not to delete IAR from my disk. regards Stefan, We are using AVR-GCC and also the IAR , Its obvious IAR follows ANSI-C more strictly than GCC (I know any embedded compiler couldnt be 100% strict in using the standard.) If you see the GCC the code generated are not as compact and optimized as those generated by IAR , I would suggest you to stick with IAR . APC |
Topic | Author | Date |
Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |