??? 11/20/07 14:15 Read: times |
#147251 - As Erik suggests Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
Unfortunately, there is no short-cut to learning 'C', and diving straight in to convert some existing assembler is probably not a terribly effective approach - as you are finding? As Erik suggests, I think you would have a far more effective learning experience if you were to set "embedded" aside for a while (especially the assembler), and concentrate on just leanring the 'C' programming language: http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=147248 Once you have got the basics of the language, you will be better equipped to understand issues like this with the 'const'... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |