??? 11/20/07 08:35 Read: times |
#147236 - 2 Issues Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Embedded C" (whatever that means) is essentially platform independent - so you have 2 largely independent issues here:
You will need to understand both, but I don't think there's any definitive answer to which should come first. People who learn assembler first tend to then write their 'C' programs as if they were assembler, and end up making things unnecessarily complicated; People who learn 'C' first tend to fall foul of the architecture specifics, and end up making things unnecessarily inefficient. It probably also depends on your background: |
Topic | Author | Date |
Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |