| ??? 08/13/07 06:04 Read: times |
#143146 - You missed the point entirely Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jerson Fernandes said:
Exactly what I was trying to communicate before I got slammed for being sexist. Just one post mentioned sexism, and that wasn't accusing you of being sexist! The point is: though the content may be purely technical, the text still has to be directed to a person - and that person must, necessarily, be male or female! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| forum enhancement request | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The "a" in Teja tells it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in slavic languages this works, too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, like "Supernova"... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ambiguous names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tennist | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Andy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more and less technical? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| he or she | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hungarian | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ... or they | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gender specifics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Latin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Latin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sexism? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another one: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good idea, Neil! :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: Another one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gender profile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think Craig's on my wavelength | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed the point entirely | 01/01/70 00:00 |