| ??? 08/04/07 23:16 Read: times |
#142773 - Benchmark Responding to: ???'s previous message |
From all the info on the web it made it look like the table-driven method was much better. I suppose I should make both and see if the performance improvememts really warrant using the extra code space for the table. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| How to create a crc table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I said it\'s simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Protocols | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| examples | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Runtime Computed Table?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Runtime...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| table is not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Benchmark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did benchmarks as such on AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Similar findings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no beavers that I've tended to!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not bitwise.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better is a strong word | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Also comment about SMBus PEC Code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Nibble Table for Poly 107 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The formula | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you seen this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now I have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, that is a Key Document! | 01/01/70 00:00 |