Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/25/07 01:40
Read: times


 
#141206 - Sequence point
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Sequence points are a concept of C/C++. They specify points at which observable effects of a piece of code are guaranteed to have occurred (ie. all side-effects are complete, and values are written back to where they should be).

A classic sequence point violation is "a = a++;"

In this case there is one sequence point, which is at the semicolon that terminates the statement. The problem is that the variable "a" is modified twice without an intervening sequence point (once by operator ++, and once by operator =). The order in which these modifications occur (or even whether they are atomic, etc) is not specified.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_point

List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Mini quiz for Friday            01/01/70 00:00      
   a classic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Non kosher C            01/01/70 00:00      
      Please Explain            01/01/70 00:00      
         The reason            01/01/70 00:00      
            The real reason???            01/01/70 00:00      
               welcome to the club            01/01/70 00:00      
            Worse than "implementation dependent"            01/01/70 00:00      
               Can you clarify this point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  splint gives a (very) detailed warning:            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sequence point            01/01/70 00:00      
   Lesson complete            01/01/70 00:00      
      The weird part            01/01/70 00:00      
      There's a fine line            01/01/70 00:00      
         Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            operator precedence            01/01/70 00:00      
               I second the motion            01/01/70 00:00      
                  As I said            01/01/70 00:00      
                     re: As I said            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Productivity?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           wrong comment            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re: Productivity            01/01/70 00:00      
                        that's IT            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Then again ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              OK, is this better ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 12 year olds are smarter            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Sorry but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Order of operations            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I know            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    How about ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          point proven            01/01/70 00:00      
         Real Work vs. Fooling Around            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got caught out recently            01/01/70 00:00      
               re: I got caught out recently            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List