Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/22/07 20:11
Modified:
  06/22/07 20:25
Read: times


 		 #141166 - Please Explain
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jeff said:
What does it do? It gives any decent compiler fits, that's what it does.

Please explain. I'm not enough of a language expert to understand why it's wrong. Also, what sort of warning or error message should a good compiler give for this code?

-- Russ


List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Mini quiz for Friday            01/01/70 00:00      
   a classic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Non kosher C            01/01/70 00:00      
      Please Explain            01/01/70 00:00      
         The reason            01/01/70 00:00      
            The real reason???            01/01/70 00:00      
               welcome to the club            01/01/70 00:00      
            Worse than "implementation dependent"            01/01/70 00:00      
               Can you clarify this point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  splint gives a (very) detailed warning:            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sequence point            01/01/70 00:00      
   Lesson complete            01/01/70 00:00      
      The weird part            01/01/70 00:00      
      There's a fine line            01/01/70 00:00      
         Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            operator precedence            01/01/70 00:00      
               I second the motion            01/01/70 00:00      
                  As I said            01/01/70 00:00      
                     re: As I said            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Productivity?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           wrong comment            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re: Productivity            01/01/70 00:00      
                        that's IT            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Then again ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              OK, is this better ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 12 year olds are smarter            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Sorry but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Order of operations            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I know            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    How about ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          point proven            01/01/70 00:00      
         Real Work vs. Fooling Around            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got caught out recently            01/01/70 00:00      
               re: I got caught out recently            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List