??? 06/15/07 10:10 Read: times |
#140833 - Times change Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
Apparently, Pascal has been conceived as a teaching tool, and as such, the Wirth's variety lacks much of the real-world's requirements. Note, how far Borland went in whipping up extensions and modifications until it started to be usable at all. But that's still PC-oriented. The embedded word expects something different - see language extensions, irregularities, nonstandard approaches (e.g. the OCG discussed now in a parallel thread - why not?)). By the time HLL on embedded processors became efficient, many programmers had gone for 'C' to escape the "strictures" of Pascal's strong typing, without seeing the consequences for coding. That set the world up for 'C' rather than Pascal. I don't think the things you mention would make any difference anymore. Steve |