Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/15/07 10:10
Read: times


 
#140833 - Times change
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jan Waclawek said:

Apparently, Pascal has been conceived as a teaching tool, and as such, the Wirth's variety lacks much of the real-world's requirements. Note, how far Borland went in whipping up extensions and modifications until it started to be usable at all. But that's still PC-oriented. The embedded word expects something different - see language extensions, irregularities, nonstandard approaches (e.g. the OCG discussed now in a parallel thread - why not?)).


By the time HLL on embedded processors became efficient, many programmers had gone for 'C' to escape the "strictures" of Pascal's strong typing, without seeing the consequences for coding. That set the world up for 'C' rather than Pascal. I don't think the things you mention would make any difference anymore.

Steve



List of 30 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
week(almost)end survey: Pascal            01/01/70 00:00      
   I think that it is a simple case of "who came firs            01/01/70 00:00      
      And what makes up that dominancy?            01/01/70 00:00      
         impossible - sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
            hummm            01/01/70 00:00      
         "Real men don't use PASCAL"            01/01/70 00:00      
   C Has Momentum            01/01/70 00:00      
   C and Pascal            01/01/70 00:00      
      Scary thought for the day.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not really            01/01/70 00:00      
            I did not want this sort of discussion...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Times change            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ...and no newborn embedded programmers anymore?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Shame            01/01/70 00:00      
                        dinosaurs? :-(            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Nah ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have heard many times that Betamax was better th            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Just a minute ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Language evolution            01/01/70 00:00      
                              missing features            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Dim and distant past            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    OOP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       PC and fat embedded OOP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          OOP assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Russ beat me to it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Delphi            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Wasn't it just the compile times?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Selling points:            01/01/70 00:00      
      FreePascal            01/01/70 00:00      
      OH NO            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List