| ??? 03/06/07 20:10 Read: times |
#134420 - You mean CY7C256? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
For quite some time, CYPRESS was the primary fab for ALTERA's large CPLD's. Some of their devices were made by Intel, some by TI, some by Cypress, and, probably, others. Each of these manufacturers benefitted in some sense, usually having the parts licensed for them to produce under their own brand.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| "Programming CPLD with AT89S52" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Things of the sort can be done... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why do you need to do that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely! But I'm still curious ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Altera used to have some code available | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| jam vs. svf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Programming CPLD with AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| like I said.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Programming CPLD with MCS-51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forget JAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at 8Kbyte AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Understanding the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's relative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cypress CPLD=Xilinx CPLD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean CY7C256? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CY27256P160 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cypress doesn't know what that is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry about the double-post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes CY7C256 TQFP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pin assigment at CPLD and AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 |