| ??? 02/19/07 16:26 Read: times |
#133253 - Nothing to do with serial-to-USB Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Russ Cooper said:
I discovered the COM9 limitation for the first time just a week or two ago with some USB-to-serial converters. Do you have any more insight into this "cheap method" you're talking about? I beleive that it has nothing to do with serial-to-USB devices or drivers. As I understand it, it is completely down to lazy application developers who couldn't be bothered to work out how to properly list available ports - so they just give you an arbitrary list of 1-9. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| cp2102 and multiple COM ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends on many things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assuming USB spec is obeyed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming CP2102 works at 480mbps! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Right, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 921600 Baud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 115.2 kbps per USB port... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know for sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USBExpress v Virtual COM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mindless unwarranted arbitrary restrictions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what I referred to by "cheap method" was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| End of wrong stick? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing to do with serial-to-USB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the list | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation Demystified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lazy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks guys | 01/01/70 00:00 |