| ??? 02/19/07 16:11 Read: times |
#133252 - what I referred to by "cheap method" was Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Do you have any more insight into this "cheap method" you're talking about?
what I referred to by "cheap method" was that the product, where I found the limitation connected a device that had nothing whatsoever to do with a serail device as a COM port. Evidently there is some 'standard software' somewhere that can be used to 'avoid' writing a USb driver if you configure your device as a COM port. Erik PS I am a member of the cleaning ladies trade union so I do not do windows. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| cp2102 and multiple COM ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends on many things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assuming USB spec is obeyed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming CP2102 works at 480mbps! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Right, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 921600 Baud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 115.2 kbps per USB port... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know for sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USBExpress v Virtual COM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mindless unwarranted arbitrary restrictions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what I referred to by "cheap method" was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| End of wrong stick? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing to do with serial-to-USB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the list | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation Demystified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lazy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks guys | 01/01/70 00:00 |