??? 12/14/06 21:20 Read: times |
#129498 - subtle, but not necessarily on the mark Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
In the US (remember the UK is different what a difference 200 years makes)
debugging - This assumes a broken unit testing - OK setting up - more of an instalation thing setup-and-testing tuning - calibration for radios calibration - usual only Adjustment preset - No adjusting - fails final test back to calibration comissioning - Only for ships Test and calibration will be understould. From my experience, I'd say that debugging is a process that takes a newly designed, unreleased, unit that has never worked, and converts it to one that actually works. Bugs (misisng semicolon, open trace, mis-set jumper, erroneous logic, erroneous PCB or wiring, etc.) can be in hardware or software. If it's "broken", this implies that it did work ... once ... and then the remediation procedure is called "repair." Testing is something else I've already described a number of times. Its purpose is to ensure that a fully characterized unit meets all pre-specified design and manufacturing criteria. RE |