SPI ISP issues | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SPI ISP issues - part 2 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SPI ISP issues - part 3 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
plural | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Fora is certainly correct | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no, it's not ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
great post! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I think the biggest problem is with the AT | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
maybe | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's not necessarily the product ... it's the docs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
OK let them be so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's true, they shouldn't be used by anyone. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What would you suggest to use? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Anything else at all would be fine ... even a PIC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Whaaaat??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ANYTHING but Atmel products! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Come on, Richard... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well, I, for one, agree with Richard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Bullshit! Stating such is entirely ridiculous! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
how can a FACT be \\\'ridiculous\\\"? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's ridiculous, because you deduce... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
single event? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, and hundreds of events with Philips, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a VERY high up 'idiot' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, mine was a long series of events | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there may be hope, sorry Kai | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It will be a WARM December day in Moscow | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
maybe someone found out | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The penalty isn't severe enough | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
blame the rest of the bunch | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, as I said, it's like U.S.-made cars | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If they'll do it to US, they'll do it to YOU! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Do you really think that others are better?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
all comapanies have things to blame them for | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Indeed! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a maxim about maxim | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Once upon a time ... there were second sources ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't love Philips, either | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't 'love' any company, but I 'love' to work w | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Once upon a time there were FAE's who knew things. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
once upon a time ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, it\'s like the grocery store | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The biggest problem is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
do it - under my name | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
All right, here is it... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Kai .. we're not getting a bit sensitive here ? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
noooooo................ hmm, maybe a bit... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Why does this come up so frequently? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Because there is so much trash in the www! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Maybe we can provide a local "fix" for that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Great idea, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the other side of the coin | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
A fool who trusts on phantasy programmers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Kai the issue is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Exactly! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Little Joe | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
did you not know | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
especially since he\'s been deceased for some time | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Lots of those "fantasy" programmers are for sale | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What a trash! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Oddly enough, similar circuits work for JTAG | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Driving cables is nasty!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
framkly, I wish eval-board makers would heed this | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Have you tested series termination? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
would be great, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Kai, I think that would be a WONDERFUL addition! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, what I am thinking ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yeah, but what's that to do with ISP? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
grits, yes, oatmeal, no | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Some of 'em will look, read, and do SOME work | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
and the winner is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
An alternative to Atmels ISP CABLE | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Profiting from highest noise margins | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
comparator | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not so well suited... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't understand. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Check the spec-sheets | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am sorry... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
cables et al | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Cables... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
software | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ps | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
To be honest... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Atmel software... a piece of @%^& | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's for amateurs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not at all | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
dear amateurs, be realistic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Erik, did you mean... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Why, oh, why | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
why, oh why | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not the issue | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
but you ARE professional!!!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
now, I'm going to upset Richard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ICE? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No success stories | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Exactly! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Grrrr! Well, maybe not this time ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it makes you wonder, doesn't it? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ATMEL cable with the HC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
another idea | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
please, pretty please | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there is no magic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you said it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you got me wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
do not blame me for what YOU said :) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
teaching is hard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
good analogy, the question is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
when I turned my back... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you forgot | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
filter | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
nope | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
upside-down | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
and the 3rd reader | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
he already did | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a good one | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
tell it beforehand | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The newbie SHALL try to build his stuff, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
allow a reply of \"you stupid idiot\" to anyone | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Will not do the trick, unfortunately | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
decoupling the LPT lines? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Low state noise margin... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
and with a Schottky? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No, I wouldn't recommend this | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
www.reichelt.de | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ok, to be more precisely... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
can you please draw it down? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Replace the 74VHC244 in the original circuit | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
How would a germanium work? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Could work! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
thanks, Kai! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Schottky diodes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
to Schottky or not to Schottky :-) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, but we must assume a minimum standard... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
shopping | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
My point is.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You can use an array | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Your search - 74S1023 - did not match any document | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SN74S1053 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
OOPS! it is 74S1053 ... sorry! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the issues | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a most telling thread | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The root problem is that the first thing one needs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
"dedicated programmer" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what's difficult to understand ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ok, how do you propose they program and erase the | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I would not be quite so sure about that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Keep in mind that this is for newbies ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
but they still have to build it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Only because it looks simple does not mean... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
he's desperate | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there are lots of circuits published like this! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I used to have memory mapped I/O in virtual | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I wouldn't say that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
that threy learn to drive with a stick shift | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Once again, you are exaggerating ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the point I\'m trying to make (and believe that I | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, but in 101 you've got to use a '51 or '31 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
nonono | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Perhaps you\'re right, in this case ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't think so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ah but.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
halelujah! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the problem with RD2 is... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what cost the most | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
cost | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
patience is what it takes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
let's sort it out | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Richard, you aregue things that, while valuable , | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Its not the cables if you ask me. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
an interesting thought | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's probably not JUST this part ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not the cable alone | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it will, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It simply has to do with the numbers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
maybe not quite ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I was assuming... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a case like that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I have | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Perhaps it's that the approach is wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I guess I have seen those ... ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
fresh thoughts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
??????????????? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'm puzzled, too, Jan | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
2 different things | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
au contraire | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
from the ISP point of view... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if you have "no reset and oscillator" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
sure | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ok \"in-situ programming\" works but that is not ISP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Does this scheme actually work reliably? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Guiness book? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
This all goes back to the "AT" in the part number | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Nothing magic with reset and oscillator | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am talking about the rusty nail | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, here you are right! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
just helping | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
200 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not quite, but I like the idea | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Exactly! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
... and that's why I advocate for the 8032 version | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Stuff it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
This will soon be moot | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Central Europe? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Mistake... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you think so, I do not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Better hope... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no love there | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Nothing is perfect... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
HUH | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
waitaminute | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
same desert | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it appears so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
male cow manure | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Eprom programmers are cheap and simple | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Cheaper than a $25 Atmel cable ? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, and widely applicable, too | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
beware | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's the usual line from an Asian vendor in U.S. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
fresh experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am not going to vote 'off topic' but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am still just thinking aloud... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
just helping | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
222 posts WOW!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
EEEK! Why would you get that close? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
post number 224 and counting | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, I\'m a dog person ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
226 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
tie a brick around his neck | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
%$#@! it happened again! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Programming Dogs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
230 tried it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |