??? 08/14/06 14:33 Read: times |
#122199 - do it - under my name Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kai Klaas said:
The biggest problem is, that newbies idiotically mean, that this ISP hardware stuff must be something very simple. Very good. Lets start our FAQ with this ("Do you really want it working? It is NOT simple.") Kai Klaas said:
They do not realize, that even here a professionally working circuitry is needed. That's why we MUST tell it out. LOUD. Kai Klaas said:
Remember the many newbies who posted, that they have something 100%-ly working, even when they omit the obligatory buffer. Fine. Sentence two. "The crap from the net MIGHT work and MIGHT not - see how many issues are we adressing below, and we won't dare to say, it is 100%". Kai Klaas said:
If I would post a professionally working circuit here, then I had to fight through an endless number of posts from people accusing me recommending bullshit, people who would aks me whether this and that is really relevant, because they have a very simple ISP circuit which 100%-ly works, which does not need what I recommended. OK, send it to me and I will post it (if you don't mind). I will face the stupid questions. Kai Klaas said:
The same newbie is not willing to read well ment written posts here, is not willing to read any application notes, is not willing to read datasheets, but is only willing to use something which does contain no more than one chip, if at all. That's why I am talking about transistors. Kai Klaas said:
The most newbies are absolutely unwilling to find out, why a 74VHC244 might be needed here. So, they are a victim of their own incompetence. Once we write everything down into a single FAQ, each such quetion will be immediately directed into it. Anyway, thanks for your support, Kai. JW |