| ??? 08/21/06 16:43 Read: times |
#122720 - I've found it ridiculous too. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The download time and install-time are quite cumbersome. I think this is because of the use of HLL's. If they'd go back to writing their code in ASM, things would be MUCH better. What's more, they'd quit putting in needless "features" that don't work and screw up the works, thinking it's no trouble to fix 'em later.
Their latest 200 MB release has already reached the third patch level and it's not yet 6 months old. It's also miles from working, even barely. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| who is imbecile Xilinx or the "GNU group"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| probably an ex microsoft employee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez, oh Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I dont see it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I compared to Lattice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A curse on software installations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mentor's notorious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still no answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Context | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any idiot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xilinx and gnu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It DID download much more slowly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xilinx website | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| would that be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most of my clients don't speak HDL ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same as Altera then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So, besides slowing everything to a crawl, what do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cygwin doesn't slow things down | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Had it been the GUI, then a few minutes would have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Portability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| we are drifting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've found it ridiculous too. | 01/01/70 00:00 |