??? 08/02/06 17:00 Modified: 08/02/06 17:07 Read: times |
#121580 - very small compared to Responding to: ???'s previous message |
so they know exactly what their failure rate is. It's very, very small, but not zero.
very small compared to intermittent errors "coded or designed in". overheating components "I did not expect that condition". broken cables. mechanical failure ... fixing the one joint in a million is dead simple compared to the effects of the above. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
reduced pin count multiplexing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
with e.g. ST2221A you need 3 pins | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No you are right Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the wiring is simpler with ST2221A (equivalent) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
was it somone named Charlie ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
check out the appnote.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reading the appnote always helps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
anyway | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
who is he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
walking through the description give you a charlie | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Small but real benefit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
who does your soldering? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A billion dollar assembly house | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
very small compared to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Statistically or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
blah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
deterministic vs predictable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and i know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but I am not talking about kettles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just a minute, there, pilgrim ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
does not matter when they will happen eventhough ' | 01/01/70 00:00 |