| ??? 07/07/06 16:39 Read: times |
#119823 - It would be interesting to know things Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Clearly the work of an imaginative person, but ...
It would be interesting to know things such as how it was verified, i.e. how the bounce times were measured and compared with the information presented in the output file. How close were they? How do we know what the sample resolution of the parallel port is? They vary quite widely, and, of course, it would be interesting to learn how the timing and sampling were managed, exactly. Since my evaluation version of WinRAR expired years ago, I'd be interested in knowing how one is intended to open that archive. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reading Bounce Characteristics on a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| System Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing in perticular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Microsoft XP; 2000; NT; 98 ;95 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't bet on it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| totally irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What loads are switched? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It would be interesting to know things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Implimentation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Again... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well the relays are ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only to detect mains voltage? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I know but..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, they are not "independent of the supply voltag | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comparable to relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optos | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exiting stuff! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It would be interesting to know things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Could somebody verifiy the result | 01/01/70 00:00 |